Why Employers Get Reintegration Wrong After Health Leave

Most return to work plans aren't built for someone coming back after cancer treatment or a mental health crisis. That gap leaves people unsupported at exactly the moment they need structure most.

---

I spoke about this on the Powered By People podcast with Edan Haddock, Head of Talent and People Experience at Movember, and his answer has stayed with me since.

Health leave pulls someone away from something that defines them, often with no certainty about how they'll feel, or who they'll be, when they come back. That uncertainty is exactly why a single, fixed approach to reintegration falls short.

Treating every return the same

Where reintegration policies exist, they're usually built around one template. A standard HR check-in. A form to sign on day one.

But a man recovering from testicular cancer treatment isn't having the same experience as someone returning after burnout. Edan put it plainly when we spoke about it.

There's no universal template for that, and trying to force one onto every case is usually where employers go wrong first.

Expecting people to be who they were before

The second mistake is harder to spot. We manage the exit carefully, then quietly expect someone to resume their old role the moment they're back, as if the time in between never happened.

Edan described it well.

That expectation lands at exactly the wrong moment. It asks for performance when what's actually needed is space.

Why this hits men particularly hard

This isn't only a process problem. It's a culture problem, and men carry a disproportionate share of it. Most of us were never taught how to talk about prostate or testicular health growing up, let alone how to talk about struggling mentally, so when a man does take health leave, he often returns having processed very little of it out loud. He's then expected to slot straight back in regardless.

Movember's own research links cancer treatment to men's sexual and mental health, and the silence that surrounds both. Loss of purpose during treatment, as Edan pointed out, is rarely recognised by employers at all, let alone planned for.

What good reintegration actually looks like

It starts with accepting there's no fixed playbook, and that the most useful thing an employer can do is build a culture where people are treated as humans first, not as resources returning to capacity.

In practice, that means individual conversations before a return date is even set, and leaders trained to spot the signs that someone is struggling rather than simply processing a form. Edan argued every leader should effectively be a mental health first aider, equipped to notice when something's wrong and know what to do next.

It also means not assuming silence equals okay. Men don't fake depression, they fake being okay, and an employer's job is to notice the difference before someone has to say it out loud.

The business case, not just the human one

This is the right thing to do, but it's also a sound one. With talent markets tighter and retention harder to win, getting reintegration right protects an investment the business has already made. Losing someone permanently because their return was handled badly is a cost most TA leaders can't afford, especially when it was avoidable.

Plan for the return, not just the leave.

Movember exists because two men in a pub decided silence was costing too much. The same lesson applies inside our businesses. If we want people to come back from health leave and stay, we need to treat their return as what it actually is: a person trying to find their footing again.

If your business doesn't have a plan for this yet, now is the time to build one, not after someone needs it.